Showing posts with label Nicholas Carr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicholas Carr. Show all posts

Monday, November 30, 2009

The De-Evolution of Man

The De-Evolution of Man

In the dawn of mankind, humans had to live like animals in comparison with modern society. The people had two simple goals: to stay alive and to procreate. If an individual could not meet these goals then he or she would die. In this fashion, the humans that lived on had traits and abilities that would reach the two goals and those characteristics would be passed on to the next generation. It is from these traits that the human race as strived and fought to survive over the millennia. Some of these characteristics that have passed through the generations can be seen today like how humans pick mates. Proof of this natural selection of mankind can be found in the human body in vestigial organs, such as the appendix and the tailbone. The appendix was used to digest plant matter in earlier humans and the tailbone is a remnant of previous ancestors that had tails. In general, traits and parts that were less beneficial to the survival of the individual were replaced and gradually decayed so that only valuable genes would survive. This is, however, until the dawn of the modern age of technology, when the strongest were not the only ones who would survive.

The drive of science has always been curiosity and with that motivation many discoveries have been made. The drive of technology is to take those discoveries and make them useful to society. From suits of armor for protection to automobiles and planes for faster travel to the internet for connecting with other people all around the world, technology would lead to innovations that would be used to expand the capabilities of people. However, like the less useful traits of the ancestors, the ability to complete tacks without the use of these innovations has been slowly decaying. Nicholas Carr has also noticed this trend in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid.” In the article, Carr writes about his realization that the over-usage of Google and skimming articles online was starting to hinder his ability to read for extended lengths of time. Carr then goes on to describe how other individuals had discovered this as well such as Bruce Friedman who was quoted saying “I can’t read War and Peace anymore,” “I’ve lost the ability to do that.” (Nicholas Carr). This trend that Carr found and brought into the light cannot even be considered something to pass through genes to the next generation. However, this is a great example of how the traits would decay as more useful ones would replace them. Carr might struggle with reading a long book, but he has access to Google and instant information on the internet.

As with Carr’s article, not all traits that decay are useless ones, just less advantageous than others that will be passed on. This is what many science fiction stories try to warn the public, because once a trait has decayed to a certain point, it would be very difficult to reacquire it. The perfect example for this is the Philip K. Dick story, “Pay for the Printer”. In this story the population has become reliant on an alien race known as Biltongs that can make perfect copies of anything that only last for a short while. When the Biltongs become extinct, the humans have to try and relearn all the skills of building and making that were lost with the ease of copying items (Dick 239). Even tasks that had been learned by the first humans to survive like finding food, making clothing and lighting a fire had been lost with the over use of the aliens. This is the fear society expects, to become so reliant on something that humans will lose their own abilities and if that tool would ever be taken away, humans would be helpless to survive.

Dick wrote another story called “Strange Eden” where adventurers find a strange planet full of plants and animals that seemed like paradise. One of the crew members decides to walk around and explore the surface and winds up meeting an alien that is so evolved she became an immortal. Brent the crew member is given the choice to stay with her and go through a rapid evolution or to leave. Brent goes with human instinct and stays with her. The captain of the ship encounters the alien who tells him to leave the planet without Brent, who has evolved into a lion like creature (Dick 111). In this story Dick wonders if the next evolution of man will actually be a step backwards. The progression of mankind has steadily been decreasing with the reliance on technology and if people keep losing their abilities to survive without reliance and the technology was ever taken away, that society will resort back to primitive ways.

In both of these ideas, the human race is not heading in a positive direction. To either become toddlers that can survive without support of someone or something or devolve back into the animal kingdom. It is not only science fiction that is portraying this fear. In the last few years, two movies have come out that really portray this warning to the audience. The first movie is Wall-E where the background is that the Earth became inhabitable and humans fled into space where they were pampered into obese sloths. The other movie is Idiocracy where in the year 2505 the entire population of Earth has become idiots due to their reliance on technology and a theory of lesser intelligent people having many more kids than more intelligent people. In Idiocracy the planet is filled with trash and simple problems like plants not growing because they are being watered with Gatorade are beyond the population. In both movies, the hero does their best to help the populace start a better life, either by returning to Earth or by having a competent leader.





Works Cited

Carr, Nicholas. "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" The Atlantic. 2007. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google

Dick, Philip K. "Pay for the Printer." pp 239-252 in The Philip K. Dick Reader, New York: Citadel Press. 1987

Dick, Philip K. "Strange Eden." pp 111-122 in The Philip K. Dick Reader, New York: Citadel Press. 1987

Idiocracy. Dir. Mike Judge. Perf. Luke Wilson and Dax Shepard. 20th Century Fox, 2006. YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Garibaldi1967, 12 Dec. 2007. Web. 28 Nov. 2009. .
Wall-E. Dir. Andrew Stanton. Perf. Jeff Garlin and Sigourney Weaver. Pixar Animation Studios, 2008. YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Johnpasma, 5 Nov. 2008. Web. 28 Nov. 2009. .

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Darwin, Zombie Apocalypse and Skynet: Yes I am an Optimist.

Darwin got me thinking about a great deal of things regarding our race and our society today. I have done a lot of thinking about our evolutionary track and where we came from and where we will eventually go. Darwin, and especially this class, made me realize a few things about evolution that I never really noticed before.
First off the human race is about as physically evolved as we are going to become. Therefore Darwin’s theory behind physical evolution loses most of its veracity with the human race. Where are we supposed to go from here? How are we supposed to evolve? This question I believe can be most easily answered by taking a new look at evolution, through brain science.
I have come to realize that although we are not physically evolving we are evolving drastically in mental capacity. We have taken the ideas of using tools and brought them to a level that has never been imaginable and these changes are so drastic that technology is changing quicker than we can really follow.
This then brings up another question. If we cannot physically evolve then how are we supposed to adapt to our surroundings? Well this can also be done through brain power through the development of medicines, prosthetics, lotions, or anything you can really think of. Technology has made evolution a thing of the past but what does this really mean for our world?
This is where my real revelation is stated. I have brought the topic up in class several times before but this is honestly where I believe our evolution is taking us. We are on the verge of a cataclysmic disaster that will destroy our world as we know it and it will be caused by our advancements in either technology or medicine. The following is my reasoning.
Throughout our selections we have read from Darwin we have learned a great deal about the general idea behind evolution. We learned about adaptation and how creatures have evolved into what they must to survive in the world today. In class we discussed a lot but they themes remained the same, everything came back to adaptation and the origin of species. The most interesting point I want to look at is that of adaptation.
Chapter 4 on page 111 of Appleman’s book covers natural selection. This chapter is a great base to start off my revelation. The idea that a species can physically evolve, grow more hair, grow larger, or even create weapons to defend themselves is amazing to me. This idea is a great example of the role nature plays in a species. But at some point you have to ask does nature really know what it is doing?
Dawkins came in at this point to attack the ideas brought up in natural selection but most importantly in the idea of creationism. Dawkins despised creationism and looked at evolution and natural selection as the only true way to understand the world. On page 577 of Appleman Dawkins basically rips apart any idea that religion plays any role in our evolution at all. He essentially is saying that the only correct train of thought is that nature adapts as it feels necessary and we need to accept that for what it is and stop making up a bunch of religious bullshit to explain something that already makes perfect sense. I can understand his frustration in this and his ideas make sense.
Eventually though we get to a point where nature can no longer take over, where the human race will rely just on their mental power to evolve, I believe we have arrived there already. Simply put we have stopped evolving and are now in charge of our own evolution through our fields of science and technology, but this can only work for so long, eventually something will backfire and we must be prepared for that, the root of this failure, could possibly be greed.
Phillip K. Dick wrote a great short story discussing this topic. It can be found on page 145 of the Phillip K. Dick reader and is called to serve the master. It discusses a war that occurred between the robots and the humans and the humans were barely able to survive from these extremely intelligent machines. This story made me think about what were to happen if we were able to make machines that could reconstruct themselves, think and even create on their own authority. That would be a reality that is not too far away and it is scary to think about what could happen if we ever created this technology.
This also reminds me of the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”. This article examined the effects on the Google search engine on our general knowledge as a society. Our evolution has not made our society smarter or advanced; it instead has taught us how to search for our answers easier. This is a step in the wrong direction, we rely on a machine to answer our questions, we don’t think on our own anymore, this is the beginning of degeneration in my mind and one that could lead to technology taking over our society before we know it.
The last thing that worries me is our advancement in medicine. We have created medicines that are able to really sustain the majority of human beings on this earth. We are becoming over populated and over immunized and that is going to end terribly. All I can picture is Mother Nature fighting back in one of two ways. The first is Zombies. I know I have mentioned this several times throughout the year but the more I think about our advancements in medicine I view zombies as an ever growing threat that could truly happen. Also with overpopulation come pollution and with pollution comes the end of our resources meaning our earth will simply crumble, both are very real and very scary.
Evolution can only take a society so far but Mother Nature can also only sustain so much. Eventually we will reach an end; there will be some sort of terrible event that will change our world as we know it. This event will surely be brought on due to our “over-evolution” and I’m very interested, scared, and intrigued as to what it will be and how it will come about.

This first video is a clip about how scientifically zombies could actually occur. All of which are based off of some sort of new invention or technology or medicine in our world today, it is a scary thought but the video brings to light some great ideas and even covers some things we already looked at in class. It is surprising to see how exactly this could happen, and also very scary at the same time.



This next video is the beginning of Terminator. I think it is a great example at how we could develop technology that could easily cause our world to fall apart and become overrun by a seemingly innocent or good technology. It is scary to think that such a “good” idea could backfire so quickly. This is just the beginning of a terrible apocalypse; if you haven’t seen terminator the robots become intelligent and take over the human race. It gets ugly……









Works Cited:
5 scientific reasons a zombie apocalypse could actually happen 5 January 2009. Video Clip. YouTube. 29 Nov. 2009

Terminator: The Beginning [Skynet Soldier] 9 April 2009. Video Clip. YouTube. 29 Nov. 2009

Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic. 2007.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google

Darwin, Charles. “Selections from Darwin’s Work.” Pp 67-254 in Darwin. 3rd ed. Phillip Appleman, ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.

Dawkins, Richard. “The Argument from Personal Incredulity.” In Darwin. 3rd ed. Phillip Appleman, ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.

Dick, Phillip K. The Phillip K. Dick Reader, New York: Citadel Press. 1987.